ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬ

Republicans in Congress are “trying to wipe out federal funding to end the HIV epidemic.”

President Joe Biden on Oct. 14, 2023, in remarks at the 2023 Human Rights Campaign National Dinner.

Are Republicans threatening to stop spending federal money to end one of the world’s most pressing public health epidemics? That’s what President Joe Biden said during a dinner hosted by an LGBTQ+ advocacy group.

“In the United States Congress, extreme MAGA Republicans are trying to undo virtually every bit of progress we’ve made,” at the Human Rights Campaign event. “They’re trying to wipe out federal funding to end the HIV epidemic.”

Programs to treat HIV and fight its spread have enjoyed bipartisan funding support in recent years, experts said, so Biden’s portrayal signals a significant departure.

When we asked the White House what Biden was referring to, of budget recommendations from House Republicans that call for large cuts to the initiative, a Trump administration-era program designed to reduce new HIV infections in the U.S., as well as other programs.

The Senate a separate . The recommendations will be subject to negotiation as the House and Senate face a Nov. 17 deadline to pass another spending bill.

We found that although Republicans are recommending significant cuts to HIV prevention efforts across a number of public health agencies, the proposal keeps core funding intact. Meanwhile, political differences are eroding bipartisan support for global HIV-prevention funding.

Despite great strides in prevention and treatment since HIV was first reported in the U.S. in the 1980s, HIV remains at epidemic levels in the U.S. today, with approximately living with HIV and around 30,000 to 35,000 new infections each year. Experts said cases are rising in the South and in rural areas, and new infection statistics show it is disproportionately affecting Black and Hispanic populations.

What Are the Proposed Cuts?

The AIDS Budget and Appropriations Coalition, a group of more than 100 public health advocacy organizations in HIV-related federal spending, said a majority of the proposed cuts to domestic HIV funding stem from House Republicans’ effort to eliminate the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

The program with the goal of reducing new HIV infections in the U.S. by 75% by 2025 and 90% by 2030. The program so far worked regionally, that have the highest rates of HIV cases for funding.

In 2023, was allocated for the program across various agencies, according to KFF’s funding tracker.

• $220 million to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

• $165 million to the Ryan White HIV/AIDS program. (It was named for a 13-year-old diagnosed with HIV in 1984 and is overseen by the Health Resources and Services Administration.)

• $5 million to the Indian Health Service.

• $26 million to the National Institutes of Health for research.

• $157.3 million to community health centers, which have treated around 200,000 HIV patients annually.

its goals as it approaches the 2025 benchmark. “It’s well designed, well planned, it has targets that makes sense,” said Jeffrey Sturchio, a lead researcher on a report.

Sturchio said the problem is not a fault of design, but funding, adding, “Congress has never fully funded the initiative.”

Sturchio pointed to a range of local and state “bureaucratic hurdles.” Jurisdictions that sufficient resources have seen “tremendous progress,” he said, and seem to be moving in the right direction.

But covid-19 reduced HIV testing and may have diverted public health efforts, . ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬHealth News reported in April that stakeholders saw progress but worried that it won’t be enough to make the 2030 deadline.

Democrats appear to share this concern. The spending bill proposed by the Democratic-controlled Senate Appropriations Committee maintained or slightly increased funding levels to all HIV-related programs. more data about the program, describing its “lack of quantifiable data showing outcomes.”

The House has not yet passed the bill out of committee. We know of some proposed , which the Republican-led House Appropriations Subcommittee released in July.

It outlines a $1.6 billion cut to the CDC, including a $220 million reduction in “HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis prevention” and a $238.5 million cut from the . The Ryan White program and support services to low-income HIV patients and of those diagnosed in the U.S.

The bill also proposes cutting funding to the by more than half — from $60 million to $28 million. According to HIV.gov, the fund targeting disparities that affect communities of color.

Additional details about how these cuts could affect programs are detailed in a committee report that has not been made public. PolitiFact and some advocacy organizations obtained copies of the report, but the House Appropriations Committee did not respond to questions about it. The report we saw recommended cutting all funding for the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

And , , and ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬHealth News have each reported that the Ryan White program and CDC cuts result from a plan to eliminate the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative.

“If they cut funding, it’s going to have a dramatic and draconian impact on the ability of all of the people who are working in these jurisdictions to improve public health,” said Sturchio, the researcher.

Although the cuts would be dramatic, experts said, they would not eliminate all domestic HIV funding.

“There is certainly a demonstration and a commitment to some of the core HIV programs, but there are millions of dollars of proposed cuts in other areas,” said Lindsey Dawson, associate director for HIV policy at KFF. “These cuts would have a meaningful impact on the ability of programs to provide lifesaving interventions for both HIV care and treatment, as well as prevention.”

The cuts would mean a 16% cut to the CDC’s division of STD prevention, a 9% cut to the Ryan White HIV/AIDS program, and a 53% cut to the Minority HIV/AIDS Fund from fiscal year 2023 to 2024.

These funding cuts are only proposals. They require a vote from the full appropriations committee and would have to pass the House and be negotiated with a Democratic-controlled Senate.

“We’ve heard for a long time that HIV is a bipartisan issue. But what some people forget, is that that bipartisanship was hard fought for over the first decade of the HIV epidemic,” said Dawson.

Other Challenges to HIV/AIDS Spending

The U.S. commitment to global HIV prevention, meanwhile, is also under scrutiny. Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, , without first making some changes. Started in , the in more than 50 countries for HIV testing, prevention, treatment, and medications. It also strengthens health care systems to fight AIDS.

Funding for the program has grown over the past 20 years, totaling more than $110 billion. 25 million lives saved by medical intervention.

Smith, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on Global Health, has expressed concerns that money is being given to nongovernmental organizations that support abortion rights and access.

the direct use of overseas funding to provide abortions or to lobby for access to abortions. This has been the case . However, that can do so with their own non-U.S. funding.

An official from the State Department, which runs the program, confirmed to PolitiFact that PEPFAR is legally restricted from funding abortion or lobbying for abortion access; the official cited the training of staff and partners and the monitoring of procedures to ensure compliance.

Other have favored a ‘ which has required foreign nongovernmental organizations to certify that they would not perform or promote abortion with funds from any source to be eligible for U.S. government funding. Trump applied the policy to PEPFAR, but Biden rescinded it.

The PEPFAR would not eliminate the program, and Congress can continue to fund the program without reauthorization, but it could cause some provisions to lapse over the next few years.

The lack of a reauthorization would have significant symbolic impact, said Kellie Moss, KFF’s associate director of global health and HIV policy. “It could make the program more vulnerable during funding discussions without a clear signal of bipartisan support.”

Although reauthorization is being held up, funding has progressed. On Sept. 28, a State Department and Foreign Operations Appropriations bill, which would fund PEPFAR for another year but implement a Mexico City-like policy provision on all global health funding. This bill would also extend the lapsing provisions for another year.

Our Ruling

Biden said that Republicans in Congress are “trying to wipe out federal funding to end the HIV epidemic.”

A subcommittee of House Republicans has proposed cutting some HIV prevention programs anywhere from 53% to 9% in fiscal 2024, depending on the program.

A committee’s draft report cited by advocacy and policy groups shows these cuts stem from the elimination of the Trump-era Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative, although the committee did not respond to questions about that.

Taken together, these cuts would not eliminate — or “wipe out” — all federal domestic HIV spending, but they do represent a significant cut.

Meanwhile, the House has not moved ahead to reauthorize PEPFAR, which supplies U.S. dollars for global HIV prevention, over Republican concerns about where organizations that receive the money stand on abortion access. But the House has passed one year of PEPFAR funding with some conditions about how it is distributed, which it can do without reauthorizing the program.

Biden’s statement is partially accurate in that significant funding cuts have been proposed by House Republicans, but he exaggerates by saying these efforts would “wipe out” federal funding.

We rate this claim Half True.

Our Sources

Email interview with a White House spokesperson, Oct. 17, 2023 

Email interview with a State Department official, Oct. 18, 2023 

Email interview with Michael Finan, communications director for Rep. Chris Smith, Oct. 16, 2023

Interview with Kellie Moss, associate director of Global Health & HIV policy at KFF, Oct. 17, 2023

Interview with Lindsey Dawson, associate director of HIV policy at KFF, Oct. 18, 2023

Interview with Nick Armstrong, manager of advocacy and government affairs at the AIDS Institute, Oct. 18, 2023

Interview with Carl Schmid, executive director of the HIV + Hepatitis Policy Institute, Oct. 18, 2023

Interview with Jeffrey Sturchio, senior associate of the Global Health Policy Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Oct. 25, 2023

AHEAD, “,” accessed Oct. 31, 2023

AIDS United, “,” accessed Oct. 31, 2023

The Associated Press, “,” Sept. 11, 2023

Center for Family and Human Rights, “,” June 6, 2023

Center for Family and Human Rights, “,” May 1, 2023

Center for Strategic and International Studies, “” Aug. 26, 2022

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “,” Oct. 17, 2023

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “,” May 24, 2022

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “,” Sept. 21, 2023

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “,” April 15, 2021

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “,” May 23, 2023

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “,” May 23, 2023

Congress.gov, “,” July 27, 2023 

Fox News, “,” June 10, 2023

HIV.gov, “,” Aug. 1, 2023

HIV.gov, “,” Oct. 18, 2023

HIV.gov, “,” Oct. 3, 2023

HIV.gov, “,” May 16, 2023 

HIV.gov, “,” Sept. 25, 2019

House Appropriations Committee, “,” July 13, 2023

House Appropriations Committee, “,” Sept. 28, 2023

House Democrats Appropriations Committee, “,” July 13, 2023 

KFF, “,” Sept. 21, 2023

KFF, “,” March 13, 2023

KFF, “,” Jan. 28, 2021

KFF, “ Feb. 9, 2021

KFF, “,” Oct. 27, 2023

KFF, “,” July 26, 2023

KFF, “,” March 5, 2019

ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬHealth News, “In Move to Slash CDC Budget, House Republicans Target Major HIV Program Trump Launched,” Sept. 8, 2023

ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬHealth News, “US Officials Want to End the HIV Epidemic by 2030. Many Stakeholders Think They Won’t,” April 24, 2023

National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, “,” July 28, 2023

NBC News, “,” Feb. 2, 2023

NBC News, “,” April 21, 2023

NBC News, “,” May 23, 2023

NPR, “” Sept. 29, 2023

Planned Parenthood, “,” Jan. 27, 2023 

Reuters, “,” Oct. 3, 2023

Roll Call, “,” Sept. 21, 2023

Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program, “,” Feb. 2022

Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program, “,” accessed Oct. 31, 2023

Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program, “,” December 2021

San Francisco AIDS Foundation, “ San Francisco AIDS Foundation,”  July 14, 2023

The Heritage Foundation, “,” May 1, 2023

The New Yorker, “,” Aug. 24, 2023

The New York Times, “,” March 24, 2023

The Washington Post, “,” July 29, 2023

The Washington Post, “,” Sept. 13, 2023

The White House, “,” Oct. 14, 2023

U.S. Congressman Chris Smith (R-N.J.), “,” Sept. 28, 2023

U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations, “,” July 27, 2023

U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations, “,” July 27, 2023

U.S. State Department, “ PEPFAR,” accessed Oct. 31, 2023

U.S. State Department, “,” accessed Oct. 31, 2023

YouTube, “,” Sept. 28, 2023

ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬHealth News Southern correspondent Sam Whitehead contributed to this report.

ËØÈËÉ«ÇéƬHealth News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .