素人色情片

Skip to content
Biden鈥檚 on Target About What Repealing ACA Would Mean for Preexisting Condition Protections
素人色情片Health News & PolitiFact HealthCheck

Biden鈥檚 on Target About What Repealing ACA Would Mean for Preexisting Condition Protections

If the Affordable Care Act were terminated, 鈥渢hat would mean over a hundred million Americans will lose protections for preexisting conditions.鈥

President Joe Biden in a campaign advertisement, May 8

President Joe Biden鈥檚 reelection campaign wants voters to contrast his record on health care policy with his predecessor鈥檚. In May, Biden鈥檚 campaign began airing a monthlong, $14 million ad campaign targeting swing-state voters and minority groups with spots on TV, digital, and radio.

In the ad, titled 鈥,鈥 Biden assails former President Donald Trump for his past promises to overturn the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. Biden also warns of the potential effect if Trump is returned to office and again pursues repeal.

鈥淭hat would mean over a hundred million Americans will lose protections for preexisting conditions,鈥 Biden said in the ad.

Less than six months from Election Day, Trump narrowly leading Biden in a head-to-head race in most swing states. And voters trust Trump to better handle issues such as inflation, crime, and the economy by significant margins.

An of about 2,200 adults, released in early May, shows the only major policy issues on which Biden received higher marks than Trump were health care and abortion access. It鈥檚 no surprise, then, that the campaign is making to Biden鈥檚 pitch to voters.

As such, we dug into the facts surrounding Biden鈥檚 claim.

Preexisting Condition Calculations

The idea that 100 million Americans are living with one or more preexisting conditions is not new. It was the subject of a back-and-forth between then-candidate Biden and then-President Trump during their previous race, in 2020. After Biden cited that statistic in a , Trump responded, 鈥淭here aren鈥檛 a hundred million people with preexisting conditions.鈥

A 素人色情片Health News/PolitiFact HealthCheck at the time rated Biden鈥檚 claim to be 鈥渕ostly true,鈥 finding a fairly large range of estimates 鈥 from 54 million to 135 million 鈥 of the number of Americans with preexisting conditions. Estimates on the lower end tend to consider 鈥減reexisting conditions鈥 to be more severe chronic conditions such as cancer or cystic fibrosis. Estimates at the spectrum鈥檚 higher end include people with more common health problems such as asthma and obesity, and behavioral health disorders such as substance use disorder or depression.

Biden鈥檚 May ad focuses on how many people would be vulnerable if protections for people with preexisting conditions were lost. This is a matter of some debate. To understand it, we need to break down the protections put in place by the ACA, and those that exist separately.

Before and After

Before the ACA鈥檚 preexisting condition protections took effect in 2014, insurers in 鈥 people buying coverage for themselves or their families 鈥 could charge higher premiums to people with particular conditions, restrict coverage of specific procedures or medications, set annual and lifetime coverage limits on benefits, or deny people coverage.

鈥淭here were a number of practices used by insurance companies to essentially protect themselves from the costs associated with people who have preexisting conditions,鈥 said , a co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University and an expert on the health insurance marketplace.

Insurers providing coverage to large employers could impose long waiting periods before employees鈥 benefits kicked in. And though employer-sponsored plans couldn鈥檛 discriminate against individual employees based on their health conditions, small-group plans for businesses with fewer than 50 employees could raise costs across the board if large numbers of employees in a given company had such conditions. That could prompt some employers to stop offering coverage.

鈥淭he insurer would say, 鈥榃ell, because you have three people with cancer, we are going to raise your premium dramatically,鈥 and therefore make it hard for the small employer to continue to offer coverage to its workers because the coverage is simply unaffordable,鈥 recalled , a research professor at Georgetown University鈥檚 McCourt School of Public Policy who researches public health insurance markets.

As a result, many people with preexisting conditions experienced what some researchers dubbed 鈥.鈥 People felt trapped in their jobs because they feared they wouldn鈥檛 be able to get health insurance anywhere else.

Some basic preexisting condition protections exist independent of the ACA. The 1996 , for example, restricted how insurers could limit coverage and mandated that employer-sponsored group plans can鈥檛 refuse to cover someone because of a health condition. Medicare and Medicaid similarly can鈥檛 deny coverage based on health background, though age and income-based eligibility requirements mean many Americans don鈥檛 qualify for that coverage.

Once the ACA鈥檚 preexisting condition protections kicked in, plans sold on the individual market had to provide a comprehensive package of benefits to all purchasers, no matter their health status.

Still, some conservatives say Biden鈥檚 claim overstates how many people are affected by Obamacare protections.

Even if you consider the broadest definition of the number of Americans living with such conditions, 鈥渢here is zero way you could justify that 100 million people would lose coverage鈥 without ACA protections, said , who was a Trump administration health policy adviser and is now a senior research fellow with the Paragon Health Institute and a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a conservative think tank.

Joseph Antos, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank, called the ad鈥檚 preexisting conditions claim 鈥渢he usual bluster.鈥 To reach 100 million people affected, he said, 鈥測ou have to assume that a large number of people would lose coverage.鈥 And that鈥檚 unlikely to happen, he said.

That鈥檚 because most people 鈥 about 55% of Americans, according to the most recent 鈥 receive health insurance through their employers. As such, they鈥檙e protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act rules, and their plans likely wouldn鈥檛 change, at least in the short term, if the ACA went away.

Antos said major insurance companies, which have operated under the ACA for more than a decade, would likely maintain the status quo even without such protections. 鈥淭he negative publicity would be amazing,鈥 he said.

People who lose their jobs, he said, would be vulnerable.

But Corlette argued that losing ACA protections could lead to Americans being priced out of their plans, as health insurers again begin medical underwriting in the individual market.

Park predicted that many businesses could also gradually find themselves priced out of their policies.

鈥淔or those firms with older, less healthy workers than other small employers, they would see their premiums rise,鈥 he told 素人色情片Health News.

Moreover, Park said, anytime people lost work or switched jobs, they鈥檇 risk losing their insurance, reverting to the old days of job lock.

鈥淚n any given year, the number [of people affected] will be much smaller than the 100 million, but all of those 100 million would be at risk of being discriminated against because of their preexisting condition,鈥 Park said.

Our Ruling

We previously ruled Biden’s claim that 100 million Americans have preexisting conditions as in the ballpark, and nothing suggests that鈥檚 changed. Depending on the definition, the number could be smaller, but it also could be even greater and is likely to have increased since 2014.

Though Biden鈥檚 claim about the number of people who would be affected if those protections went away seems accurate, it is unclear how a return to the pre-ACA situation would manifest.

On the campaign trail this year, Trump has promised 鈥 as he did many times in the past 鈥 to with something better. But he鈥檚 never produced a replacement plan. Biden鈥檚 claim shouldn鈥檛 be judged based on his lack of specificity.

We rate Biden鈥檚 claim Mostly True.

our sources

ABC News/Ipsos Poll, 鈥,鈥 May 5, 2024

Avalere, “,” Oct. 23, 2018

Biden-Harris 2024 campaign email, 鈥淣EW AD: Biden-Harris 2024 Launches 鈥楾erminate鈥 Slamming Trump for Attacks on Health Care,鈥 May 8, 2024

Center for American Progress, 鈥,鈥 Oct. 2, 2019

Census Bureau, 鈥,鈥 September 2023

CNN, 鈥,鈥 Oct. 22, 2018

Department of Health and Human Services, 鈥,鈥 Jan. 5, 2017

Department of Health and Human Services, 鈥,鈥 accessed May 15, 2024

Email exchanges with Biden-Harris 2024 campaign official, May 13-15, 2024

Email exchange with Karoline Leavitt, Trump 2024 campaign national press secretary, May 13, 2024

KFF, 鈥,鈥 May 15, 2024

KFF, 鈥,鈥 Feb. 6, 2024

素人色情片Health News, 鈥Drowning in a 鈥楬igh-Risk Insurance Pool鈥 鈥 At $18,000 a Year,鈥 Feb. 27, 2017

素人色情片Health News and PolitiFact, 鈥Biden鈥檚 in the Ballpark on How Many People Have Preexisting Conditions,鈥 Oct. 1, 2020

The New York Times, 鈥,鈥 May 13, 2024

Phone interview and email exchanges with , a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the director of the Private Health Reform Initiative at the Paragon Health Institute, May 14-15, 2024

Phone interview with , a research professor at Georgetown University鈥檚 McCourt School of Public Policy, May 22, 2024

Phone interview with , a co-director of the Center on Health Insurance Reforms at Georgetown University, May 14, 2024

Truthsocial.com, , Nov. 25, 2023

The Wall Street Journal, 鈥,鈥 Sept. 23, 2017

Work, Aging and Retirement, 鈥,鈥 Feb. 19, 2016

YouTube.com/@CSPAN, 鈥,鈥 Sept. 29, 2020

YouTube.com/@JoeBiden, 鈥溾 campaign advertisement, May 10, 2024

Phone interview with Joseph Antos, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, June 5, 2024

Health Affairs, , Sept. 11, 2020

KFF, , Dec. 12, 2016

PolitiFact, 鈥,鈥 June 3, 2024